mirror of
https://github.com/paboyle/Grid.git
synced 2024-11-10 07:55:35 +00:00
Updated to do list
This commit is contained in:
parent
242e447bc5
commit
5548fd6928
31
TODO
31
TODO
@ -2,41 +2,39 @@
|
||||
- use protocol buffers? replace xmlReader/Writer ec..
|
||||
- Binary use htonll, htonl
|
||||
|
||||
*** Hacks and bug fixes to clean up
|
||||
* Had to hack assignment to 1.0 in the tests/Grid_gamma test
|
||||
y
|
||||
* norm2l is a hack. figure out syntax error and make this norm2 c.f. tests/Grid_gamma.cc
|
||||
* Reduce implemention is poor
|
||||
* Bug in SeedFixedIntegers gives same output on each site.
|
||||
* Bug in RNG with complex numbers ; only filling real values; need helper function -- DONE
|
||||
* Conformable test in Cshift routines.
|
||||
|
||||
*** Functionality
|
||||
|
||||
* Command line args for geometry, simd, etc. layout. Is it necessary to have
|
||||
user pass these? Is this a QCD specific?
|
||||
|
||||
* Strong test for norm2, conj and all primitive types. -- Grid_simd test is almost there
|
||||
|
||||
* Expression template engine:
|
||||
|
||||
- Audit
|
||||
- Introduce base clase for Grid Tensors.
|
||||
- Introduce norm2 unary op.
|
||||
- Introduce conversion automatic from expression to Lattice<vobj>
|
||||
-
|
||||
|
||||
* Command line args for geometry, simd, etc. layout. Is it necessary to have
|
||||
user pass these? Is this a QCD specific?
|
||||
|
||||
* CovariantShift support -----Use a class to store gauge field? (parallel transport?)
|
||||
|
||||
* Strong test for norm2, conj and all primitive types. -- Grid_simd test is almost there
|
||||
|
||||
* Reduce implemention is poor
|
||||
* Bug in SeedFixedIntegers gives same output on each site.
|
||||
* Bug in RNG with complex numbers ; only filling real values; need helper function -- DONE
|
||||
|
||||
* norm2l is a hack. figure out syntax error and make this norm2 c.f. tests/Grid_gamma.cc
|
||||
|
||||
** Make the Tensor types and Complex etc... play more nicely.
|
||||
|
||||
- TensorRemove is a hack, come up with a long term rationalised approach to Complex vs. Scalar<Scalar<Scalar<Complex > > >
|
||||
QDP forces use of "toDouble" to get back to non tensor scalar. This role is presently taken TensorRemove, but I
|
||||
want to introduce a syntax that does not require this.
|
||||
|
||||
- Reductions that contract indices on a site should always demote the tensor structure.
|
||||
norm2(), innerProduct.
|
||||
|
||||
- Result of Sum(), SliceSum // spatial sums
|
||||
trace, traceIndex etc.. do not.
|
||||
|
||||
- problem arises because "trace" returns Lattice<TComplex> moving everything down to Scalar,
|
||||
and then Sum and SliceSum to not remove the Scalars. This would be fixed if we
|
||||
template specialize the scalar scalar scalar sum and SliceSum, on the basis of being
|
||||
@ -46,7 +44,6 @@ y
|
||||
- I have collated into single location at least.
|
||||
- Need to use _mm_*insert/extract routines.
|
||||
|
||||
* Conformable test in Cshift routines.
|
||||
|
||||
* Flavour matrices?
|
||||
* Pauli, SU subgroup, etc..
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user