1
0
mirror of https://github.com/paboyle/Grid.git synced 2024-09-19 16:55:37 +01:00
Grid/HMC/README
2019-05-22 09:56:26 +01:00

110 lines
4.0 KiB
Plaintext

********************************************************************
TODO:
********************************************************************
i) Got mixed precision in 2f and EOFA force and action solves.
But need mixed precision in the heatbath solve. Best for Fermop to have a "clone" method, to
reduce the number of solver and action objects. Needed ideally for the EOFA heatbath.
15% perhaps
Combine with 2x trajectory length?
ii) Rational on EOFA HB -- relax order
-- Test the approx as per David email
Resume / roll.sh
----------------------------------------------------------------
- 16^3 Currently 10 traj per hour
- EOFA use a different derivative solver from action solver
- EOFA fix Davids hack to the SchurRedBlack guessing
*** Reduce precision/tolerance in EOFA with second CG param. (10% speed up)
*** Force gradient - reduced precision solve for the gradient (4/3x speedup)
*** Need a plan for gauge field update for mixed precision in HMC (2x speed up)
-- Store the single prec action operator.
-- Clone the gauge field from the operator function argument.
-- Build the mixed precision operator dynamically from the passed operator and single prec clone.
*** Mixed precision CG into EOFA portion
*** Further reduce precision in forces to 10^-6 ?
*** Overall: a 3x or so is still possible => 500s -> 160s and 20 traj per hour on 16^3.
- Use mixed precision CG in HMC
- SchurRedBlack.h: stop use of operator function; use LinearOperator or similar instead.
- Or make an OperatorFunction for mixed precision as a wrapper
********************************************************************
* Signed off 2+1f HMC with Hasenbush and strange RHMC 16^3 x 32 DWF Ls=16 Plaquette 0.5883 ish
* Signed off 2+1f HMC with Hasenbush and strange EOFA 16^3 x 32 DWF Ls=16 Plaquette 0.5883 ish
* Wilson plaquette cross checked against CPS and literature GwilsonFnone
********************************************************************
********************************************************************
* RHMC: Timesteps & eigenranges matched from previous CPS 16^3 x 32 runs:
********************************************************************
****
Strange (m=0.04) has eigenspan
****
16^3 done as 1+1+1 with separate PV's.
/dirac1/archive/QCDOC/host/QCDDWF/DWF/2+1f/16nt32/IWASAKI/b2.13/ls16/M1_8/ms0.04/mu0.01/rhmc_multitimescale/evol5/work
****
2+1f 16^3 - [ 4e^-4, 2.42 ] for strange
****
24^3 done as 1+1+1 at strange, and single quotient https://arxiv.org/pdf/0804.0473.pdf Eq 83,
****
double lambda_low = 4.0000000000000002e-04 <- strange
double lambda_low = 1.0000000000000000e-02 <- pauli villars
And high = 2.5
Array bsn_mass[3] = {
double bsn_mass[0] = 1.0000000000000000e+00
double bsn_mass[1] = 1.0000000000000000e+00
double bsn_mass[2] = 1.0000000000000000e+00
}
Array frm_mass[3] = {
double frm_mass[0] = 4.0000000000000001e-02
double frm_mass[1] = 4.0000000000000001e-02
double frm_mass[2] = 4.0000000000000001e-02
}
***
32^3
/dirac1/archive/QCDOC/host/QCDDWF/DWF/2+1f/32nt64/IWASAKI/b2.25/ls16/M1_8/ms0.03/mu0.004/evol6/work
***
Similar det scheme
double lambda_low = 4.0000000000000002e-04
double lambda_low = 1.0000000000000000e-02
Array bsn_mass[3] = {
double bsn_mass[0] = 1.0000000000000000e+00
double bsn_mass[1] = 1.0000000000000000e+00
double bsn_mass[2] = 1.0000000000000000e+00
}
Array frm_mass[3] = {
double frm_mass[0] = 3.0000000000000002e-02
double frm_mass[1] = 3.0000000000000002e-02
double frm_mass[2] = 3.0000000000000002e-02
}
********************************************************************
* Grid: Power method bounds check
********************************************************************
- Finding largest eigenvalue approx 25 not 2.5
- Conventions:
Grid MpcDagMpc based on:
(Moo-Moe Mee^-1 Meo)^dag(Moo-Moe Mee^-1 Meo)
- with Moo = 5-M5 = 3.2
- CPS use(d) Moo = 1
- Eigenrange in Grid is 3.2^2 rescaled so factor of 10 accounted for