a HUGE amount of difficult to resolve and understand conflicts .
Wholesale formatting, reordering functions etc... in a central file like Tensor_class
or Grid_vector_types while others are also editing without making substantial functionality
changes creates pain.
class, changing the nature of covariant Cshifts used in
plaquettes, rectangles and staples.
As a result same code is used for the plaq and rect action independent of the BC type.
Should probably isolate the BC in a separate class that Gimpl takes as a template param.
Do the same with smearing policies.
This would then allow composition of BC with smearing etc....
preparing to pass integrator, smearing, bc's as policy classes to hmc.
Propose to unify "integrator" and integrator algorithm in a base/derived
way to override step. Want to read through ForceGradient to ensure
that abstraction covers the force gradient case.
Allows multi-precision work and paves the way for alternate BC's and such like
allowing for example G-parity which is important for K pipi programme.
In particular, can drive an extra flavour index into the fermion fields
using template types.
Tanh/Zolo * (Cayley/PartFrac/ContFrac) * (Mobius/Shamir/Wilson)
Approx Representation Kernel.
All are done with space-time taking part in checkerboarding, Ls uncheckerboarded
Have only so far tested the Domain Wall limit of mobius, and at that only checked
that it
i) Inverts
ii) 5dim DW == Ls copies of 4dim D2
iii) MeeInv Mee == 1
iv) Meo+Mee+Moe+Moo == M unprec.
v) MpcDagMpc is hermitan
vi) Mdag is the adjoint of M between stochastic vectors.
That said, the RB schur solve, RB MpcDagMpc solve, Unprec solve
all converge and the true residual becomes small; so pretty good tests.
